BriefBank
Samuelson Clinic
Home Search Browse Contribute a Brief About Us Our Contributors

Browse Briefs by: Case | Court | Contributor


A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z   Show All

Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes
Court: US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Moving Party: Universal City Studios, Inc., Paramount Pictures Corporation, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios , Inc. (MGM), Tristar Pictures, Inc., Columbia Pictures Industries Inc., Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., Disney Enterprises Inc., Twentieth Century Fox Film
Responding Party: Shawn C. Reimerdes and Roman Kazan, Eric Corely [sic], aka Emmanuel Goldstein, and 2600 Enterprises Inc.
  Written By Intervening Party
  •  
  • DOJ Reply Brief for Intervenor United States of America [Feb 2001] [HTML]
      Written By Moving Party
  •  
  • Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to RIAA, SMDI And Verance's Motion To Dismiss [Aug 2001] [HTML]
  •  
  • Reply Brief of Movie Industry Plaintiffs-Appellee [Feb 2001] [HTML]
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
  • Amicus from Law Profs for Plaintiffs [Mar 2001] [HTML]
  •  
  • DVDCCA Amicus for Plaintiffs [Mar 2001] [HTML]
  •  
  • MPAA Suppl Letter Brief for Plaintiffs [May 2001] [HTML]
      Written By Responding Party
  •  
  • EFF Reply Brief for Appellates Corely and 2600 [Mar 2001] [HTML]
  •  
  • Post-Trial Memorandum of Law in MPAA v. 2600 [Aug 2000] [HTML]
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
  • ACLU Amicus Brief in Support of Appellants Corely and 2600 [Jan 2001] [PDF]
  •  
  • ACM Amicus Brief in Support of Appellants Corely and 2600 [Jan 2001] [HTML]
  •  
  • Benkler & Lessig Amici Brief for Appellants Corely and 2600 [Jan 2001] [HTML]
  •  
  • Educators Amici Brief in Support of Appellant [Jan 2001] [HTML]
  •  
  • EFF Suppl Letter Brief [May 2001] [HTML]
  •  
  • Journalists' & Publishers' Amici Brief for Appellants Corely and 2600 [Jan 2001] [HTML]
  •  
  • Programmers' & Academics Amici for Appellants and Reversal of the Judgment Below [Jan 2001] [HTML]
    ^top

    US v. Dunifer
    Court: US District Court, Northern California District
    Moving Party: United States of America
    Responding Party: Stephen Paul Dunifer
      Written By Responding Party
  •  
  • Defendant's Memorandum of Points and Authorities [HTML]
  •  
  • Reply Brief Filed on Behalf of Dunifer [Jul 1999] [HTML]
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
  • NLGCDC Amicus Brief for Dunifer [HTML]
    ^top

    US v. Elcomsoft
    Court: US District Court, Northern California District, San Jose Division
    Moving Party: United States of America
    Responding Party: Elcom Ltd., a/k/a Elcomsoft Co., Ltd., and Dmitry Sklyarov
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
  • EFF Amicus for Motion to Dismiss [Feb 2002] [PDF]
    ^top

    US v. Vopper
    Court: US Supreme Court
    Moving Party: Petitioner United States of America appeared as an intervenor of right in the court of appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2403(a). Petitioners Gloria Bartnicki and Anthony F. Kane, Jr.
    Responding Party: Frederick W. Vopper, a/k/a Fred Williams; Keymarket of NEPA, Inc., d/b/a WILK Radio; Lackazerne, Inc., d/b/a WGBI Radio; and Jack Yocum
      Written By Moving Party
  •  
  • Government's Petition for a Writ of Certiorari [Feb 2000] [PDF]
    ^top

    [Home] [Search] [Browse] [Contribute a Brief] [About Us] [Our Contributors]
    Comments, questions about this page to: techclinic-webmaster@law.berkeley.edu [FAQ] [Privacy Policy] [Legal Notices]
    School of Information Management and Systems Samuelson Law, Technology, and Public Policy Clinic