BriefBank
Samuelson Clinic
Home Search Browse Contribute a Brief About Us Our Contributors

Browse Briefs by: Case | Court | Contributor

  • ACLU of Northern California (6 Briefs)
  • Anonymous Contributors (1 Brief)
  • Center for Democratic Communications of the National Lawyers Guild (5 Briefs)
  • Electronic Frontier Foundation (40 Briefs)
  • Electronic Privacy Information Center (19 Briefs)
  • Fairuse-Stanford (13 Briefs)
  • Media Access Project (5 Briefs)
  • Public Citizen (12 Briefs)
  • Samuelson Law, Technology, and Public Policy Clinic (3 Briefs)
  • Tyler T. Ochoa (1 Brief)

ACLU of Northern California
Case: ACLU v. Miller
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division
Moving Party: American Civil Liberties Union of Georgia, et al
Responding Party: Zell Miller
  Written By Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Plaintiff Brief in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction [HTML]
    Case: Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition
    Court: US Supreme Court
    Moving Party: John D. Ashcroft, et al
    Responding Party: The Free Speech Coalition
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  ACLU Amici Brief in Support of the Respondents [Apr 2002] [PDF]
    Case: Curzon Brown v. San Francisco Community College District
    Court: Superior Court of California, City and County of San Francisco
    Moving Party: Daniel Curzon Brown
    Responding Party: San Fransisco Community College District, Teacher Review, Ryan Lathouwers, Associated Students, and Does 1 through 25
      Written By Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Defendant Ryan Lathouwers’ Reply Brief in Support of His Special Motion to Strike and Demurrer [Oct 2000] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  Respondent's Memorandum of Points and Authorities [Jan 2000] [HTML]
    Case: Kathleen R. v. City of Livermore
    Court: Superior Court of California, County of Alameda
    Moving Party: Kathleen R.
    Responding Party: City of Livermore, et al
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  ACLU Amici Brief in Support of the Defendant [Jul 1998] [HTML]
    Case: Pavlovich v. Superior Court
    Court: Supreme Court of California
    Moving Party: Matthew Pavlovich
    Responding Party: The Superior Court of Santa Clara County; DVD Copy Control Assocation Inc.
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Amicus Brief of the ACLU of Northern California in Support of Petitioner [Apr 2002] [PDF]
    ^top

    Anonymous Contributors
    Case: Eldred v. Ashcroft
    Court: US Supreme Court
    Moving Party: Eric Eldred, et al
    Responding Party: John Ashcroft, in his official capacity as Attorney General
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Amici of the American Association of Law Libraries, American Historical Association, American Library Association, et al. [May 2002] [PDF]
    ^top

    Center for Democratic Communications of the National Lawyers Guild
    Case: Dougan v. FCC
    Court: US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    Moving Party: William Leigh Dougan
    Responding Party: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  MicroRadio Amicus Brief for Petitioner [Dec 1993] [HTML]
    Case: Radio Canyon Lake v. Ashcroft
    Court: US District Court, Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division
    Moving Party: Radio Canyon Lake, et al.
    Responding Party: John Ashcroft, et al.
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  National Lawyers Guild Center Amicus Brief for Defendant [Jan 2002] [PDF]
    Case: US v. Dunifer
    Court: US District Court, Northern California District
    Moving Party: United States of America
    Responding Party: Stephen Paul Dunifer
      Written By Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Defendant's Memorandum of Points and Authorities [HTML]
  •  
    		•  Reply Brief Filed on Behalf of Dunifer [Jul 1999] [HTML]
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  NLGCDC Amicus Brief for Dunifer [HTML]
    ^top

    Electronic Frontier Foundation
    Case: ACLU v. Reno (COPA) (District Court)
    Court: US District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    Moving Party: American Civil Liberties Union, et al.
    Responding Party: Janet Reno, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Amici Brief for ACLU in ACLU v. Reno [Jan 1999] [HTML]
    Case: ALS Scan, Inc. v. Remarq Cmtys., Inc.
    Court: US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
    Moving Party: ALS Scan, Incorporated
    Responding Party: REMARQ Communities, Incorporated
      Written By Neither Party
  •  
    		•  Non-Party Infospace, Inc.'s Memorandum re: Motion of J. Doe to Quash Subpoena Issued to Silicon Investor/Infospace, Inc. [Mar 2001] [HTML]
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  EFF Amicus for RemarQ Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc [Mar 2001] [HTML]
    Case: Am. Amusement Mach. Ass'n v. Kendrick
    Court: US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
    Moving Party: American Amusement Machine Association, Amusement & Music Operators Assocation, Indiana Amusement & Music Operators Assocation, et al.,
    Responding Party: Teri Kendrick, in her official capacity as the designated City Prosecutor of the City of Indianapolis, Jack L. Cottey, Sheriff, Bart Peterson, Mayor, et al
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  EFF Amicus Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants [Nov 2000] [HTML]
    Case: Ashcroft v. ACLU (COPA)
    Court: US Supreme Court
    Moving Party: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States
    Responding Party: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Androgyny Books, Inc. d/b/a/ a Different Light BookStores, American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression, Artnet Worldwide Corp., Backstripe, Addazi Inc. d/b/a Condomania, Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF),
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  VLA and PFAW Amici for Respondents [Sep 1999] [PDF]
    Case: Bernstein v. United States Dep't of Commerce
    Court: US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    Moving Party: Daniel J. Bernstein
    Responding Party: United States Dep't of Commerce, et al.
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Amici Brief for Appellee Bernstein [Nov 1997] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  Maynard Anderson, et al., for Appellee Bernstein [Nov 1997] [HTML]
    Case: DVD Copy Control Assn. v. Bunner
    Court: Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District
    Moving Party: DVD Copy Control Association
    Responding Party: Andrew Bunner
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  EFF Amici Curiae for Bunner [May 2001] [HTML]
    Case: Eldred v. Ashcroft
    Court: US Supreme Court
    Moving Party: Eric Eldred, et al
    Responding Party: John Ashcroft, in his official capacity as Attorney General
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Internet Archive Amicus Curiae for Petitioners [Jan 2002] [PDF]
    Case: Felten v.RIAA
    Court: US District Court, New Jersey
    Moving Party: Edward W. Felten; Bede Liu; Scott A. Craver; Min Wu; Dan S. Wallach; Ben Swartzlander; Adam Stubblefield; Richard Drews Dean; and Usenix Association
    Responding Party: Recording Industry Association of America, Inc (RIAA).; Secure Digital Music Inititative Foundation (SDMIF); Verance Corporation; John Ashcroft, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States; DOES 1 through 4, inclusive,
      Written By Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to RIAA, SMDI And Verance's Motion To Dismiss [Aug 2001] [HTML]
    Case: Heathmount A.E. Corp. v. Technodome.com
    Court: US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
    Moving Party: Heathmount A.E. Corporation
    Responding Party: Technodome.com; Destinationtechnodome.com
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  NSI Amicus Curiae Brief for Plaintiff-Appellee Heathmount [Jul 2001] [HTML]
      Written By Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Appellant Technodome's Brief in Heathmount v. Technodome.com [Mar 2001] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  Reply Brief of Appellants [Sep 2001] [PDF]
    Case: Hollis-Eden v. Wells
    Court: Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One
    Moving Party: Hollis-Eden Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
    Responding Party: MICHAEL WELLS (aka Angelawatch)
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  EFF Amicus for Appellant Michael Wells (aka Angelawatch) [Feb 2002] [HTML]
    Case: Intel Corp. v. Hamidi
    Court: Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District
    Moving Party: Intel Corporation
    Responding Party: Kourosh Kenneth Hamidi
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  EFF Amicus for Appellant Hamidi and FACE-Intel [Jan 2000] [HTML]
    Case: Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp.
    Court: US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    Moving Party: Leslie A. Kelly
    Responding Party: Arriba Soft Corporation and Does 1 through 100
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  EFF Amicus for Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc by Defendant-Appellee Ditto.Com, Inc. (Formerly Arriba Soft Corporation) [Feb 2002] [HTML]
    Case: Kesler v. Doe
    Court: Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three
    Moving Party: Grant S. Kesler
    Responding Party: John Doe a.k.a Mezzzman
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  EFF Amicus Brief for Appellant John Doe ak. "Mezzzmann" [Oct 2001] [HTML]
    Case: Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.
    Court: US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    Moving Party: Robert C. Konop
    Responding Party: Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  EFF Amicus for Plaintiff-Appellant Robert Konop against petition for rehearing en banc [Mar 2000] [HTML]
    Case: Kremen v. NSI
    Court: US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    Moving Party: Gary Kremen
    Responding Party: Stephen Michael Cohen, Ocean Fund International, Ltd., , Ynata Ltd., Sand Man Internacional Limited, S.A. de C.V., and DOES 1-20, Defendants-Appellants, and NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC., a corporation, Defendant/Cross-Appellee.
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  EFF Amicus Brief for Reversing the District Court's Summary Judgement in favor of Network Solutions, Inc [Jan 2002] [HTML]
    Case: MGM v. Grokster
    Court: US District Court, Central District of California, Western Division
    Moving Party: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc., et al.
    Responding Party: Grokster, Ltd., et al.
      Written By Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Defendant Grokster's Reply Memorandum for Motion for Partial Summary Judgement [Mar 2002] [PDF]
  •  
    		•  StreamCast Reply Brief for Motion for Partial Summary Judgement [Feb 2002] [PDF]
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Kazaa Reply for Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgement [Feb 2002] [PDF]
    Case: Pavlovich v. Superior Court
    Court: Supreme Court of California
    Moving Party: Matthew Pavlovich
    Responding Party: The Superior Court of Santa Clara County; DVD Copy Control Assocation Inc.
      Written By Moving Party
  •  
    		•  EFF Opening Brief for Pavlovich [Jan 2002] [HTML]
    Case: Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes
    Court: US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
    Moving Party: Universal City Studios, Inc., Paramount Pictures Corporation, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios , Inc. (MGM), Tristar Pictures, Inc., Columbia Pictures Industries Inc., Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., Disney Enterprises Inc., Twentieth Century Fox Film
    Responding Party: Shawn C. Reimerdes and Roman Kazan, Eric Corely [sic], aka Emmanuel Goldstein, and 2600 Enterprises Inc.
      Written By Intervening Party
  •  
    		•  DOJ Reply Brief for Intervenor United States of America [Feb 2001] [HTML]
      Written By Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to RIAA, SMDI And Verance's Motion To Dismiss [Aug 2001] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  Reply Brief of Movie Industry Plaintiffs-Appellee [Feb 2001] [HTML]
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Amicus from Law Profs for Plaintiffs [Mar 2001] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  DVDCCA Amicus for Plaintiffs [Mar 2001] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  MPAA Suppl Letter Brief for Plaintiffs [May 2001] [HTML]
      Written By Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Post-Trial Memorandum of Law in MPAA v. 2600 [Aug 2000] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  EFF Reply Brief for Appellates Corely and 2600 [Mar 2001] [HTML]
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  ACLU Amicus Brief in Support of Appellants Corely and 2600 [Jan 2001] [PDF]
  •  
    		•  Programmers' & Academics Amici for Appellants and Reversal of the Judgment Below [Jan 2001] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  Journalists' & Publishers' Amici Brief for Appellants Corely and 2600 [Jan 2001] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  Educators Amici Brief in Support of Appellant [Jan 2001] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  EFF Suppl Letter Brief [May 2001] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  Benkler & Lessig Amici Brief for Appellants Corely and 2600 [Jan 2001] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  ACM Amicus Brief in Support of Appellants Corely and 2600 [Jan 2001] [HTML]
    Case: US v. Elcomsoft
    Court: US District Court, Northern California District, San Jose Division
    Moving Party: United States of America
    Responding Party: Elcom Ltd., a/k/a Elcomsoft Co., Ltd., and Dmitry Sklyarov
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  EFF Amicus for Motion to Dismiss [Feb 2002] [PDF]
    Case: Yahoo!, Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme et L'Antisemitisme
    Court: US District Court, Northern California District, San Jose Division
    Moving Party: YAHOO! INC., a Delaware Corporation
    Responding Party: La Ligue Contre Le Racisme Et L'Antisemitisme, a French Association, et al.
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Application of Amici v. Curiae to File Brief In Support of Plaintiff [Apr 2001] [PDF]
    ^top

    Electronic Privacy Information Center
    Case: ACLU v. Reno (CDA)
    Court: US Supreme Court
    Moving Party: Janet Reno
    Responding Party: American Civil Liberties Union, et al
      Written By Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Brief of Appellees American Civil Liberties Union, et al [Feb 1997] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  Motion to Affirm [Oct 1996] [HTML]
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Amicus Brief of Site Specific, Inc. and Jon Lebkowsky for Appellees [Feb 1997] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and the Student Press Law Center in Support of the Appellees [Feb 1997] [HTML]
    Case: Ashcroft v. ACLU (COPA)
    Court: US Supreme Court
    Moving Party: John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States
    Responding Party: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Androgyny Books, Inc. d/b/a/ a Different Light BookStores, American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression, Artnet Worldwide Corp., Backstripe, Addazi Inc. d/b/a Condomania, Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF),
      Written By Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Brief for the Petitioner on Writ of Certiorari [Jul 2001] [PDF]
    Case: Bernstein v. United States Dep't of Commerce
    Court: US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    Moving Party: Daniel J. Bernstein
    Responding Party: United States Dep't of Commerce, et al.
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  EPIC Amici Brief for Appellee Bernstein [Nov 1997] [HTML]
    Case: Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility v. United States Secret Service
    Court: US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
    Moving Party: Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR)
    Responding Party: United States Secret Service
      Written By Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Brief for Appellee [Jun 1995] [HTML]
    Case: Conboy v. AT&T
    Court: US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
    Moving Party: Edward J. Conboy, Eileen M. Conboy, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
    Responding Party: AT&T Corporation and AT&T Universal Card Services Corporation
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  EPIC Amicus Supporting Appellants and Urging Reversal [HTML]
    Case: Karn v. United States Dep't of State
    Court: US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
    Moving Party: Philip R. Karn, Jr.
    Responding Party: US Department of State and Thomas E. McNamara
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  EPIC Brief of Amici Curiae for Plaintiff [Oct 1996] [HTML]
    Case: Marc Alan Greidinger v. Bobby W. Davis, et al.
    Court: US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
    Moving Party: Marc Alan Greidinger
    Responding Party: Bobby W. Davis, et al.
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  CPSR Amicus in Support of Appellant Greidinger [Jun 1992] [HTML]
    Case: Reno v. Condon
    Court: US Supreme Court
    Moving Party: Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States, et al
    Responding Party: Charlie Condon, Attorney General for the State of South Carolina, et al
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Amicus of EPIC in Support of Petitioners [Jul 1999] [PDF]
    Case: Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, et al v. Stratton, Ohio
    Court: US Supreme Court
    Moving Party: WATCHTOWER BIBLE AND TRACT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK, INC., and WELLSVILLE, OHIO, CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES, INC.
    Responding Party: VILLAGE OF STRATTON, OHIO, and JOHN M. ABDALLA, Mayor of the Village of Stratton, Ohio, in his official capacity
      Written By Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Brief for Petitioners on Writ of Certiorari [PDF]
  •  
    		•  Reply Brief of Petitioners on Writ of Certiorari [PDF]
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Amicus Curiae Electronic Privacy Information Center, American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio and 14 Legal Scholars in Support of Watchtower Bible, etc., Petitioners [Oct 2001] [PDF]
  •  
    		•  Amicus of RealCampaignReform.org, Free Speech Defense and Education Fund, Lincoln Institute for Research and Education, Capitol Hill Prayer Alert Foundation, U.S. Justice Foundation, Gun Owners of America, Inc., et al [PDF]
  •  
    		•  Brief of Amicus Curiae Independent Baptist Churches of America [PDF]
  •  
    		•  Brief of Amicus Curiae the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) [PDF]
      Amicus For Neither Party
  •  
    		•  Brief of Amicus Curiae Brennan Center for Justice [PDF]
      Written By Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Brief for Respondents on Writ of Certiorari [PDF]
    ^top

    Fairuse-Stanford
    Case: Princeton Univ. Press v. Michigan Document Servs.
    Court: US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
    Moving Party: Princeton University Press, Macmillan, Inc., and St. Martin's Press, Inc.
    Responding Party: Michigan Document Services, Inc., and James M. Smith
      Written By Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellees [Nov 1994] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  Supplemental Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellees [May 1996] [HTML]
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Amicus of National Music Publishers' Association, Inc. for Plaintiffs-Appellees [May 1996] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  Amicus of the Association of American University Presses, Inc. for Appellees' Suggestion of Rehearing En Banc [Feb 1996] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  Amicus of the National Association of College Stores, Inc. for Plaintiffs-Appellees [May 1996] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  Brief of Amicus Curiae Follett Corporation [May 1996] [HTML]
      Written By Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Brief of Defendants-Appellants, Michigan Document Services, Inc. and James M. Smith [Oct 1994] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  Defendants-Appellants' Opposition to Motions For Leave to File Briefs Amicus Curiae [Mar 1996] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  Defendants-Appellants Opposition to Rehearing [Mar 1996] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  Reply Brief of Defendants-Appellants [Dec 1994] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  Supplemental En Banc Brief of Defendants-Appellants Michigan Document Services, Inc., and James M. Smith [May 1996] [HTML]
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Authors' Guild Brief in Support of Plaintiff [Feb 1996] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  School Boards' Amici Curiae Brief in Support of Defendants-Appellants [HTML]
    ^top

    Media Access Project
    Case: Consumer Fed'n of Am. v. FCC, et al
    Court: US Supreme Court
    Moving Party: Consumer Federation of America (CFA), et al
    Responding Party: Federal Communications Commission (FCC), et al
      Written By Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Reply Brief for Petitioners on Writ of Certiorari [Nov 2001] [PDF]
    Case: Fox TV Stations, Inc. v. FCC
    Court: US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
    Moving Party: Fox TV Stations, Inc.
    Responding Party: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
      Amicus For Intervenor Party
  •  
    		•  Initial Brief of Intervenors/Amici Curiae [Feb 2002] [PDF]
    Case: N.Y. Times Co. v. Tasini
    Court: US Supreme Court
    Moving Party: The New York Times Company, Inc.; Newsday, Inc.; The Time Incorporated Magazine Company; Lexis/Nexis and University Microfilms International
    Responding Party: Jonathan Tasini; Mary Kay Blakeley; Barbara Garson; Margot Mifflin; Sonia Jaffe Robbins; and David S. Whitford
      Written By Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Brief for Petitioners N.Y. Times Co. on Writ of Certiorari [PDF]
    Case: NAB v. FCC
    Court: US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
    Moving Party: National Association of Broadcasters, et al
    Responding Party: Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, United Church of Christ, Office of Communication; National Council of the Churches of Christ, Communication Commission; General Board of Global Ministries of the United Methodist Churc
      Written By Intervenor Party
  •  
    		•  Brief for Intervenors Supporting Respondents [Oct 2000] [PDF]
    Case: Satellite Broad. & Communs. Ass'n v. FCC,
    Court: US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
    Moving Party: Satellite Broadcasting and Communications Association, et al
    Responding Party: Federal Communications Commission
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Amici Brief in Support of the Government [Aug 2001] [PDF]
    ^top

    Public Citizen
    Case: Alitalia v. Porta
    Court: US District Court, Southern District of New York
    Moving Party: Alitalia-Linee Aeree Italiane S.P.A.
    Responding Party: William Porta
      Written By Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Preliminary Injunction [Jan 2001] [HTML]
    Case: Dendrite Int'l, Inc. v. Doe No. 3
    Court: Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
    Moving Party: Dendrite International, Inc.
    Responding Party: John Does Nos. 1 through 4 and Does 5 through 14, inclusive
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Public Citizen Amici Brief for Defendant [Mar 2001] [HTML]
    Case: Donato v. Moldow
    Court: Superior Court of New Jersey, Bergen County Law Division
    Moving Party: (Vincent Donato, Eric Obernauer, Lawrence R. Campanga, and Gina Calogero) and (Stephen Moldow, Third Party Plaintiff)
    Responding Party: (Stephen Moldow, John Does Nos. 1-40, Jane Does 1-20) and (Kenneth Hoffman, Richard Reform 1 through 10 and Rita Reform 1 through 10, Third Party Defendants)
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Public Citzen Amicus for Defendant [Oct 2001] [HTML]
    Case: Hollis-Eden v. Wells
    Court: Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One
    Moving Party: Hollis-Eden Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
    Responding Party: MICHAEL WELLS (aka Angelawatch)
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Public Citizen Reply Memorandum for Plaintiff [Mar 2001] [HTML]
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Public Citizen Memorandum for Motion to Strike [Mar 2001] [HTML]
    Case: Hritz v. Doe
    Court: US District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division
    Moving Party: Jane Doe
    Responding Party: John Hritz
      Written By Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Remand [Nov 2000] [HTML]
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Public Citizen for Defendant [HTML]
    Case: Servicemaster Company et al. v. Virga
    Court: US District Court, Western District of Tennessee, Western Division at Memphis
    Moving Party: The Servicemaster Company, the Terminix International Company, L.P., Trugreen Limited Partnership, American Home Shield Corporation, and Amerispec, Inc.,
    Responding Party: Carla Virga
      Written By Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Defendant's Memorandum [HTML]
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Public Citizen Reply Brief for Defendant [Feb 2000] [HTML]
    Case: Taubman Co L P v. Mishkoff, et al
    Court: US District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division
    Moving Party: Taubman Company Limited Partnership
    Responding Party: Webfeats and Henry Mishkoff
      Written By Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Memorandum for Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgement [Mar 2002] [PDF]
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Public Citizen Amicus Brief for Defendant Against Preliminary Injunction [Jan 2002] [HTML]
  •  
    		•  Public Citizen as Amicus Curiae for Mishkoff [Nov 2001] [HTML]
    ^top

    Samuelson Law, Technology, and Public Policy Clinic
    Case: Eldred v. Ashcroft
    Court: US Supreme Court
    Moving Party: Eric Eldred, et al
    Responding Party: John Ashcroft, in his official capacity as Attorney General
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Amici Brief for Archives In support of Petitioners [May 2002] [PDF]
    Case: Intel Corp. v. Hamidi
    Court: Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District
    Moving Party: Intel Corporation
    Responding Party: Kourosh Kenneth Hamidi
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Hamidi California Supreme IP Profs Amicus [Jul 2002] [PDF]
    Case: Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp.
    Court: US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    Moving Party: Leslie A. Kelly
    Responding Party: Arriba Soft Corporation and Does 1 through 100
      Amicus For Responding Party
  •  
    		•  Google Inc. as Amicus Curiae for Petitioners [Mar 2002] [PDF]
    ^top

    Tyler T. Ochoa
    Case: Eldred v. Ashcroft
    Court: US Supreme Court
    Moving Party: Eric Eldred, et al
    Responding Party: John Ashcroft, in his official capacity as Attorney General
      Amicus For Moving Party
  •  
    		•  Amici for OAH and H-Law in Support of Petitioners [May 2002] [PDF]
    ^top

    [Home] [Search] [Browse] [Contribute a Brief] [About Us] [Our Contributors]
    Comments, questions about this page to: techclinic-webmaster@law.berkeley.edu [FAQ] [Privacy Policy] [Legal Notices]
    School of Information Management and Systems Samuelson Law, Technology, and Public Policy Clinic