|
|
|
||||
 |
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Browse Briefs by: Case | Court | Contributor
|
| US Supreme Court |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | ACLU v. Reno (CDA) |
| Court: | US Supreme Court |
| Moving Party: | Janet Reno |
| Responding Party: | American Civil Liberties Union, et al |
| Written By Responding Party |
| Brief of Appellees American Civil Liberties Union, et al [Feb 1997] [HTML] |
| Motion to Affirm [Oct 1996] [HTML] |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| Amicus Brief of Site Specific, Inc. and Jon Lebkowsky for Appellees [Feb 1997] [HTML] |
| Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and the Student Press Law Center in Support of the Appellees [Feb 1997] [HTML] |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Ashcroft v. ACLU (COPA) |
| Court: | US Supreme Court |
| Moving Party: | John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States |
| Responding Party: | American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Androgyny Books, Inc. d/b/a/ a Different Light BookStores, American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression, Artnet Worldwide Corp., Backstripe, Addazi Inc. d/b/a Condomania, Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), |
| Written By Moving Party |
| Brief for the Petitioner on Writ of Certiorari [Jul 2001] [PDF] |
| Government's Petition For a Writ of Certiorari [Sep 2001] [PDF] |
| Reply Brief for the Petitioner [May 2001] [PDF] |
| Amicus For Moving Party |
| Amici Brief of Members of Congress in Support of Petitioner Ashcroft [Jul 2001] [PDF] |
| Written By Responding Party |
| Respondents' Brief in Opposition on Petition for a Writ of Certiorari [Apr 2001] [PDF] |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| Brief of Amici Curiae In Support of Respondents [Sep 2001] [PDF] |
| VLA and PFAW Amici for Respondents [Sep 1999] [PDF] |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition |
| Court: | US Supreme Court |
| Moving Party: | John D. Ashcroft, et al |
| Responding Party: | The Free Speech Coalition |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| ACLU Amici Brief in Support of the Respondents [Apr 2002] [PDF] |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Consumer Fed'n of Am. v. FCC, et al |
| Court: | US Supreme Court |
| Moving Party: | Consumer Federation of America (CFA), et al |
| Responding Party: | Federal Communications Commission (FCC), et al |
| Written By Moving Party |
| Reply Brief for Petitioners on Writ of Certiorari [Nov 2001] [PDF] |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Eldred v. Ashcroft |
| Court: | US Supreme Court |
| Moving Party: | Eric Eldred, et al |
| Responding Party: | John Ashcroft, in his official capacity as Attorney General |
| Written By Moving Party |
| Reply Brief for the Petitioners [Dec 2001] [PDF] |
| Amicus For Moving Party |
| Amici Brief for Archives In support of Petitioners [May 2002] [PDF] |
| Amici Curiae of Intellectual Property Law Professors [May 2002] [PDF] |
| Amici for OAH and H-Law in Support of Petitioners [May 2002] [PDF] |
| Amici of the American Association of Law Libraries, American Historical Association, American Library Association, et al. [May 2002] [PDF] |
| Internet Archive Amicus Curiae for Petitioners [Jan 2002] [PDF] |
| Written By Responding Party |
| Brief for the Respondent in Opposition on Petition for a Writ of Certiorari [Dec 2001] [PDF] |
| Petition for a Writ of Certiorari [Oct 2001] [PDF] |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | N.Y. Times Co. v. Tasini |
| Court: | US Supreme Court |
| Moving Party: | The New York Times Company, Inc.; Newsday, Inc.; The Time Incorporated Magazine Company; Lexis/Nexis and University Microfilms International |
| Responding Party: | Jonathan Tasini; Mary Kay Blakeley; Barbara Garson; Margot Mifflin; Sonia Jaffe Robbins; and David S. Whitford |
| Written By Moving Party |
| Brief for Petitioners N.Y. Times Co. on Writ of Certiorari [PDF] |
| Written By Responding Party |
| Brief for Respondents Tasini, Blakely, Mifflin & Whitford On Writ of Certiorari [PDF] |
| Respondents’ Brief on Writ of Cert Petition [PDF] |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| Burns Amicus [Jan 2001] [PDF] |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Reno v. Condon |
| Court: | US Supreme Court |
| Moving Party: | Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States, et al |
| Responding Party: | Charlie Condon, Attorney General for the State of South Carolina, et al |
| Amicus For Moving Party |
| Amicus of EPIC in Support of Petitioners [Jul 1999] [PDF] |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | US v. Vopper |
| Court: | US Supreme Court |
| Moving Party: | Petitioner United States of America appeared as an intervenor of right in the court of appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2403(a). Petitioners Gloria Bartnicki and Anthony F. Kane, Jr. |
| Responding Party: | Frederick W. Vopper, a/k/a Fred Williams; Keymarket of NEPA, Inc., d/b/a WILK Radio; Lackazerne, Inc., d/b/a WGBI Radio; and Jack Yocum |
| Written By Moving Party |
| Government's Petition for a Writ of Certiorari [Feb 2000] [PDF] |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, et al v. Stratton, Ohio |
| Court: | US Supreme Court |
| Moving Party: | WATCHTOWER BIBLE AND TRACT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK, INC., and WELLSVILLE, OHIO, CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES, INC. |
| Responding Party: | VILLAGE OF STRATTON, OHIO, and JOHN M. ABDALLA, Mayor of the Village of Stratton, Ohio, in his official capacity |
| Written By Moving Party |
| Brief for Petitioners on Writ of Certiorari [PDF] |
| Reply Brief of Petitioners on Writ of Certiorari [PDF] |
| Amicus For Moving Party |
| Brief of Amicus Curiae Independent Baptist Churches of America [PDF] |
| Brief of Amicus Curiae the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) [PDF] |
| Amicus For Neither Party |
| Brief of Amicus Curiae Brennan Center for Justice [PDF] |
| Written By Responding Party |
| Brief for Respondents on Writ of Certiorari [PDF] |
| US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility v. United States Secret Service |
| Court: | US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit |
| Moving Party: | Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR) |
| Responding Party: | United States Secret Service |
| Written By Moving Party |
| Brief for Appellee [Jun 1995] [HTML] |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Fox TV Stations, Inc. v. FCC |
| Court: | US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit |
| Moving Party: | Fox TV Stations, Inc. |
| Responding Party: | Federal Communications Commission and United States of America |
| Amicus For Intervenor Party |
| Initial Brief of Intervenors/Amici Curiae [Feb 2002] [PDF] |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Karn v. United States Dep't of State |
| Court: | US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit |
| Moving Party: | Philip R. Karn, Jr. |
| Responding Party: | US Department of State and Thomas E. McNamara |
| Amicus For Moving Party |
| EPIC Brief of Amici Curiae for Plaintiff [Oct 1996] [HTML] |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | NAB v. FCC |
| Court: | US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit |
| Moving Party: | National Association of Broadcasters, et al |
| Responding Party: | Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, United Church of Christ, Office of Communication; National Council of the Churches of Christ, Communication Commission; General Board of Global Ministries of the United Methodist Churc |
| Written By Intervenor Party |
| Brief for Intervenors Supporting Respondents [Oct 2000] [PDF] |
| US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Conboy v. AT&T |
| Court: | US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit |
| Moving Party: | Edward J. Conboy, Eileen M. Conboy, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| Responding Party: | AT&T Corporation and AT&T Universal Card Services Corporation |
| Amicus For Moving Party |
| EPIC Amicus Supporting Appellants and Urging Reversal [HTML] |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Reimerdes |
| Court: | US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit |
| Moving Party: | Universal City Studios, Inc., Paramount Pictures Corporation, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios , Inc. (MGM), Tristar Pictures, Inc., Columbia Pictures Industries Inc., Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., Disney Enterprises Inc., Twentieth Century Fox Film |
| Responding Party: | Shawn C. Reimerdes and Roman Kazan, Eric Corely [sic], aka Emmanuel Goldstein, and 2600 Enterprises Inc. |
| Written By Intervening Party |
| DOJ Reply Brief for Intervenor United States of America [Feb 2001] [HTML] |
| Written By Moving Party |
| Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to RIAA, SMDI And Verance's Motion To Dismiss [Aug 2001] [HTML] |
| Reply Brief of Movie Industry Plaintiffs-Appellee [Feb 2001] [HTML] |
| Amicus For Moving Party |
| Amicus from Law Profs for Plaintiffs [Mar 2001] [HTML] |
| DVDCCA Amicus for Plaintiffs [Mar 2001] [HTML] |
| MPAA Suppl Letter Brief for Plaintiffs [May 2001] [HTML] |
| Written By Responding Party |
| EFF Reply Brief for Appellates Corely and 2600 [Mar 2001] [HTML] |
| Post-Trial Memorandum of Law in MPAA v. 2600 [Aug 2000] [HTML] |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| ACLU Amicus Brief in Support of Appellants Corely and 2600 [Jan 2001] [PDF] |
| ACM Amicus Brief in Support of Appellants Corely and 2600 [Jan 2001] [HTML] |
| Benkler & Lessig Amici Brief for Appellants Corely and 2600 [Jan 2001] [HTML] |
| Educators Amici Brief in Support of Appellant [Jan 2001] [HTML] |
| EFF Suppl Letter Brief [May 2001] [HTML] |
| Journalists' & Publishers' Amici Brief for Appellants Corely and 2600 [Jan 2001] [HTML] |
| Programmers' & Academics Amici for Appellants and Reversal of the Judgment Below [Jan 2001] [HTML] |
| US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | ALS Scan, Inc. v. Remarq Cmtys., Inc. |
| Court: | US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit |
| Moving Party: | ALS Scan, Incorporated |
| Responding Party: | REMARQ Communities, Incorporated |
| Written By Neither Party |
| Non-Party Infospace, Inc.'s Memorandum re: Motion of J. Doe to Quash Subpoena Issued to Silicon Investor/Infospace, Inc. [Mar 2001] [HTML] |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| EFF Amicus for RemarQ Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc [Mar 2001] [HTML] |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Heathmount A.E. Corp. v. Technodome.com |
| Court: | US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit |
| Moving Party: | Heathmount A.E. Corporation |
| Responding Party: | Technodome.com; Destinationtechnodome.com |
| Amicus For Moving Party |
| NSI Amicus Curiae Brief for Plaintiff-Appellee Heathmount [Jul 2001] [HTML] |
| Written By Responding Party |
| Appellant Technodome's Brief in Heathmount v. Technodome.com [Mar 2001] [HTML] |
| Reply Brief of Appellants [Sep 2001] [PDF] |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Marc Alan Greidinger v. Bobby W. Davis, et al. |
| Court: | US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit |
| Moving Party: | Marc Alan Greidinger |
| Responding Party: | Bobby W. Davis, et al. |
| Amicus For Moving Party |
| CPSR Amicus in Support of Appellant Greidinger [Jun 1992] [HTML] |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Satellite Broad. & Communs. Ass'n v. FCC, |
| Court: | US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit |
| Moving Party: | Satellite Broadcasting and Communications Association, et al |
| Responding Party: | Federal Communications Commission |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| Amici Brief in Support of the Government [Aug 2001] [PDF] |
| US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Princeton Univ. Press v. Michigan Document Servs. |
| Court: | US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit |
| Moving Party: | Princeton University Press, Macmillan, Inc., and St. Martin's Press, Inc. |
| Responding Party: | Michigan Document Services, Inc., and James M. Smith |
| Written By Moving Party |
| Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellees [Nov 1994] [HTML] |
| Supplemental Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellees [May 1996] [HTML] |
| Amicus For Moving Party |
| Amicus of National Music Publishers' Association, Inc. for Plaintiffs-Appellees [May 1996] [HTML] |
| Amicus of the Association of American University Presses, Inc. for Appellees' Suggestion of Rehearing En Banc [Feb 1996] [HTML] |
| Amicus of the National Association of College Stores, Inc. for Plaintiffs-Appellees [May 1996] [HTML] |
| Brief of Amicus Curiae Follett Corporation [May 1996] [HTML] |
| Written By Responding Party |
| Brief of Defendants-Appellants, Michigan Document Services, Inc. and James M. Smith [Oct 1994] [HTML] |
| Defendants-Appellants' Opposition to Motions For Leave to File Briefs Amicus Curiae [Mar 1996] [HTML] |
| Defendants-Appellants Opposition to Rehearing [Mar 1996] [HTML] |
| Reply Brief of Defendants-Appellants [Dec 1994] [HTML] |
| Supplemental En Banc Brief of Defendants-Appellants Michigan Document Services, Inc., and James M. Smith [May 1996] [HTML] |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| Authors' Guild Brief in Support of Plaintiff [Feb 1996] [HTML] |
| School Boards' Amici Curiae Brief in Support of Defendants-Appellants [HTML] |
| US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Am. Amusement Mach. Ass'n v. Kendrick |
| Court: | US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit |
| Moving Party: | American Amusement Machine Association, Amusement & Music Operators Assocation, Indiana Amusement & Music Operators Assocation, et al., |
| Responding Party: | Teri Kendrick, in her official capacity as the designated City Prosecutor of the City of Indianapolis, Jack L. Cottey, Sheriff, Bart Peterson, Mayor, et al |
| Amicus For Moving Party |
| EFF Amicus Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants [Nov 2000] [HTML] |
| US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Bernstein v. United States Dep't of Commerce |
| Court: | US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
| Moving Party: | Daniel J. Bernstein |
| Responding Party: | United States Dep't of Commerce, et al. |
| Amicus For Moving Party |
| Amici Brief for Appellee Bernstein [Nov 1997] [HTML] |
| EPIC Amici Brief for Appellee Bernstein [Nov 1997] [HTML] |
| Maynard Anderson, et al., for Appellee Bernstein [Nov 1997] [HTML] |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Dougan v. FCC |
| Court: | US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
| Moving Party: | William Leigh Dougan |
| Responding Party: | Federal Communications Commission and United States of America |
| Amicus For Moving Party |
| MicroRadio Amicus Brief for Petitioner [Dec 1993] [HTML] |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp. |
| Court: | US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
| Moving Party: | Leslie A. Kelly |
| Responding Party: | Arriba Soft Corporation and Does 1 through 100 |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| EFF Amicus for Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc by Defendant-Appellee Ditto.Com, Inc. (Formerly Arriba Soft Corporation) [Feb 2002] [HTML] |
| Google Inc. as Amicus Curiae for Petitioners [Mar 2002] [PDF] |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. |
| Court: | US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
| Moving Party: | Robert C. Konop |
| Responding Party: | Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. |
| Amicus For Moving Party |
| EFF Amicus for Plaintiff-Appellant Robert Konop against petition for rehearing en banc [Mar 2000] [HTML] |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Kremen v. NSI |
| Court: | US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
| Moving Party: | Gary Kremen |
| Responding Party: | Stephen Michael Cohen, Ocean Fund International, Ltd., , Ynata Ltd., Sand Man Internacional Limited, S.A. de C.V., and DOES 1-20, Defendants-Appellants, and NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC., a corporation, Defendant/Cross-Appellee. |
| Amicus For Moving Party |
| EFF Amicus Brief for Reversing the District Court's Summary Judgement in favor of Network Solutions, Inc [Jan 2002] [HTML] |
| US District Court, Central District of California, Western Division |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | MGM v. Grokster |
| Court: | US District Court, Central District of California, Western Division |
| Moving Party: | Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc., et al. |
| Responding Party: | Grokster, Ltd., et al. |
| Written By Responding Party |
| Defendant Grokster's Reply Memorandum for Motion for Partial Summary Judgement [Mar 2002] [PDF] |
| StreamCast Reply Brief for Motion for Partial Summary Judgement [Feb 2002] [PDF] |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| Kazaa Reply for Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgement [Feb 2002] [PDF] |
| US District Court, Northern California District |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | US v. Dunifer |
| Court: | US District Court, Northern California District |
| Moving Party: | United States of America |
| Responding Party: | Stephen Paul Dunifer |
| Written By Responding Party |
| Defendant's Memorandum of Points and Authorities [HTML] |
| Reply Brief Filed on Behalf of Dunifer [Jul 1999] [HTML] |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| NLGCDC Amicus Brief for Dunifer [HTML] |
| US District Court, Northern California District, San Jose Division |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | US v. Elcomsoft |
| Court: | US District Court, Northern California District, San Jose Division |
| Moving Party: | United States of America |
| Responding Party: | Elcom Ltd., a/k/a Elcomsoft Co., Ltd., and Dmitry Sklyarov |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| EFF Amicus for Motion to Dismiss [Feb 2002] [PDF] |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Yahoo!, Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme et L'Antisemitisme |
| Court: | US District Court, Northern California District, San Jose Division |
| Moving Party: | YAHOO! INC., a Delaware Corporation |
| Responding Party: | La Ligue Contre Le Racisme Et L'Antisemitisme, a French Association, et al. |
| Amicus For Moving Party |
| Application of Amici v. Curiae to File Brief In Support of Plaintiff [Apr 2001] [PDF] |
| US District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Taubman Co L P v. Mishkoff, et al |
| Court: | US District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division |
| Moving Party: | Taubman Company Limited Partnership |
| Responding Party: | Webfeats and Henry Mishkoff |
| Written By Responding Party |
| Memorandum for Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgement [Mar 2002] [PDF] |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| Public Citizen Amicus Brief for Defendant Against Preliminary Injunction [Jan 2002] [HTML] |
| Public Citizen as Amicus Curiae for Mishkoff [Nov 2001] [HTML] |
| US District Court, New Jersey |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Felten v.RIAA |
| Court: | US District Court, New Jersey |
| Moving Party: | Edward W. Felten; Bede Liu; Scott A. Craver; Min Wu; Dan S. Wallach; Ben Swartzlander; Adam Stubblefield; Richard Drews Dean; and Usenix Association |
| Responding Party: | Recording Industry Association of America, Inc (RIAA).; Secure Digital Music Inititative Foundation (SDMIF); Verance Corporation; John Ashcroft, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States; DOES 1 through 4, inclusive, |
| Written By Moving Party |
| Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to RIAA, SMDI And Verance's Motion To Dismiss [Aug 2001] [HTML] |
| US District Court, Southern District of New York |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Alitalia v. Porta |
| Court: | US District Court, Southern District of New York |
| Moving Party: | Alitalia-Linee Aeree Italiane S.P.A. |
| Responding Party: | William Porta |
| Written By Responding Party |
| Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Preliminary Injunction [Jan 2001] [HTML] |
| US District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | ACLU v. Reno (COPA) (District Court) |
| Court: | US District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Moving Party: | American Civil Liberties Union, et al. |
| Responding Party: | Janet Reno, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the United States |
| Amicus For Moving Party |
| Amici Brief for ACLU in ACLU v. Reno [Jan 1999] [HTML] |
| US District Court, Western District of Tennessee, Western Division at Memphis |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Servicemaster Company et al. v. Virga |
| Court: | US District Court, Western District of Tennessee, Western Division at Memphis |
| Moving Party: | The Servicemaster Company, the Terminix International Company, L.P., Trugreen Limited Partnership, American Home Shield Corporation, and Amerispec, Inc., |
| Responding Party: | Carla Virga |
| Written By Responding Party |
| Defendant's Memorandum [HTML] |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| Public Citizen Reply Brief for Defendant [Feb 2000] [HTML] |
| US District Court, Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Radio Canyon Lake v. Ashcroft |
| Court: | US District Court, Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division |
| Moving Party: | Radio Canyon Lake, et al. |
| Responding Party: | John Ashcroft, et al. |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| National Lawyers Guild Center Amicus Brief for Defendant [Jan 2002] [PDF] |
| US District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Hritz v. Doe |
| Court: | US District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division |
| Moving Party: | Jane Doe |
| Responding Party: | John Hritz |
| Written By Responding Party |
| Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Remand [Nov 2000] [HTML] |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| Public Citizen for Defendant [HTML] |
| Supreme Court of California |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Pavlovich v. Superior Court |
| Court: | Supreme Court of California |
| Moving Party: | Matthew Pavlovich |
| Responding Party: | The Superior Court of Santa Clara County; DVD Copy Control Assocation Inc. |
| Written By Moving Party |
| EFF Opening Brief for Pavlovich [Jan 2002] [HTML] |
| Amicus For Moving Party |
| Amicus Brief of the ACLU of Northern California in Support of Petitioner [Apr 2002] [PDF] |
| Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Intel Corp. v. Hamidi |
| Court: | Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District |
| Moving Party: | Intel Corporation |
| Responding Party: | Kourosh Kenneth Hamidi |
| Amicus For Moving Party |
| Hamidi California Supreme IP Profs Amicus [Jul 2002] [PDF] |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| EFF Amicus for Appellant Hamidi and FACE-Intel [Jan 2000] [HTML] |
| Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Hollis-Eden v. Wells |
| Court: | Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One |
| Moving Party: | Hollis-Eden Pharmaceuticals, Inc., |
| Responding Party: | MICHAEL WELLS (aka Angelawatch) |
| Amicus For Moving Party |
| Public Citizen Reply Memorandum for Plaintiff [Mar 2001] [HTML] |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| EFF Amicus for Appellant Michael Wells (aka Angelawatch) [Feb 2002] [HTML] |
| Public Citizen Memorandum for Motion to Strike [Mar 2001] [HTML] |
| Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Kesler v. Doe |
| Court: | Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three |
| Moving Party: | Grant S. Kesler |
| Responding Party: | John Doe a.k.a Mezzzman |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| EFF Amicus Brief for Appellant John Doe ak. "Mezzzmann" [Oct 2001] [HTML] |
| Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | DVD Copy Control Assn. v. Bunner |
| Court: | Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District |
| Moving Party: | DVD Copy Control Association |
| Responding Party: | Andrew Bunner |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| EFF Amici Curiae for Bunner [May 2001] [HTML] |
| Superior Court of California, County of Alameda |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Kathleen R. v. City of Livermore |
| Court: | Superior Court of California, County of Alameda |
| Moving Party: | Kathleen R. |
| Responding Party: | City of Livermore, et al |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| ACLU Amici Brief in Support of the Defendant [Jul 1998] [HTML] |
| Superior Court of California, City and County of San Francisco |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Curzon Brown v. San Francisco Community College District |
| Court: | Superior Court of California, City and County of San Francisco |
| Moving Party: | Daniel Curzon Brown |
| Responding Party: | San Fransisco Community College District, Teacher Review, Ryan Lathouwers, Associated Students, and Does 1 through 25 |
| Written By Responding Party |
| Defendant Ryan Lathouwers’ Reply Brief in Support of His Special Motion to Strike and Demurrer [Oct 2000] [HTML] |
| Respondent's Memorandum of Points and Authorities [Jan 2000] [HTML] |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | ACLU v. Miller |
| Court: | US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division |
| Moving Party: | American Civil Liberties Union of Georgia, et al |
| Responding Party: | Zell Miller |
| Written By Moving Party |
| Plaintiff Brief in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction [HTML] |
| Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Dendrite Int'l, Inc. v. Doe No. 3 |
| Court: | Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division |
| Moving Party: | Dendrite International, Inc. |
| Responding Party: | John Does Nos. 1 through 4 and Does 5 through 14, inclusive |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| Public Citizen Amici Brief for Defendant [Mar 2001] [HTML] |
| Superior Court of New Jersey, Bergen County Law Division |
|
|
|
|
| Case: | Donato v. Moldow |
| Court: | Superior Court of New Jersey, Bergen County Law Division |
| Moving Party: | (Vincent Donato, Eric Obernauer, Lawrence R. Campanga, and Gina Calogero) and (Stephen Moldow, Third Party Plaintiff) |
| Responding Party: | (Stephen Moldow, John Does Nos. 1-40, Jane Does 1-20) and (Kenneth Hoffman, Richard Reform 1 through 10 and Rita Reform 1 through 10, Third Party Defendants) |
| Amicus For Responding Party |
| Public Citzen Amicus for Defendant [Oct 2001] [HTML] |
 |
|||||
| [Home] | [Search] | [Browse] | [Contribute a Brief] | [About Us] | [Our Contributors] |
 |
|
| Comments, questions about this page to: techclinic-webmaster@law.berkeley.edu | [FAQ] [Privacy Policy] [Legal Notices] |
| School of Information Management and Systems | Samuelson Law, Technology, and Public Policy Clinic |